Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-13-2009, 05:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 326

Tank - '76 El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
K&N Air Filters

Who's using them
Who's not

if not why not


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 07:26 AM   #2 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 55.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
Please use the search engine or look around first. K&N filters have sprung up here quite a few times. Please do not multiply posts when you don't have to.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 09:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,678

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
Nope, I don't use em. It doesn't help at all if you are driving to get good mileage. Plus, they let more crud through the filter and can gum up MAF sensors with the oil from the filter.

Testing to prove it:
Testing a 'performance' air filter for MPG - Part 1 - MetroMPG.com
Testing a 'performance' air filter for MPG - Part 2 - MetroMPG.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 11:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
Intermediate EcoDriver
 
Mustang Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 264

White Pony - '07 Mustang V6 Premium Coupe
Team Ford
90 day: 29.98 mpg (US)

Big Red - '89 F-250 4WD Custom
90 day: 15.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 24 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
...Plus, they let more crud through the filter and can gum up MAF sensors with the oil from the filter.
I have over a mile of dusty dirt road between my house and the nearest paved road. I tried a K&N on my truck for a year. There was no difference in performance or economy. When I checked the filter, I found dust in the filter housing on the "clean" side of the filter.
I'll stick with OEM paper filters.
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!


Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 12:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,363

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
I can't wait to get my ECOMODDER.COM window stickers......I'll get 2-3 mpg AND 10-15hp just by puttin the stickers on!!!!!!! yuck yuck yuck!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 12:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
If you want a cleanable filter that doesn't gum up MAF sensors, and has no potential issues with diesel engines, get one from AEM or Fram. They're cotton gauze material, washable, and don't require oil.

K&N filters aren't any more environmentally responsible, either. You're using soap which contains phosphates to wash out the dirt/grime/oil that is going down the drain into the public water supply, making it even more difficult to provide clean water, or further poisoning your local water table in the event that you're using a well.

Farmers out here will tell you that one drop of oil will contaminate 1,000,000 gallons of water. It's not to a harmful level, but the point is to be very aware of what you're doing.

Wash that filter out, and you're doing just as much harm as you would be by throwing that paper filter into the landfill. Where's the logic?

There's a reason that K&N doesn't make these claims on their own... they rely on fanboys to make the claims for them.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
TEiN (01-07-2010)
Old 12-13-2009, 01:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 48

Vandle - '69 E-330 chateau

ranger brad - '94 Ranger xl
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
He says in his research, that at wot it might be more efficient than stock paper. Do some of the pulse and gliders use wot? would a air intake different than a geo metro negate the test results and maybe make a k&n worth wild? I sure don't like to whole allowing dirt in thing though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 01:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
WOT is normally a very bad situation. In ECU-controlled cars, enrichment happens, and the AF ratio is richened to the point where it's no longer being efficient. 80% seems to be the max throttle angle.

In carb'd cars, it just opens an enrichment circuit which is normally uncalibrated to a specific AF ratio, and dumps some fuel in there unmetered to aide in cooling the engine under high load.

Again, 80% (depending on carb config) is usually about the cut-off. In either event, K&N still doesn't make any of these claims on their own.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 01:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,121

The Geo - '93 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 38 Times in 35 Posts
These threads should stop now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 02:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 326

Tank - '76 El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
well I've always used them and never had any problems, then again only one of the cars in my family have a MAF We usually drive older cars and they always have helped in fuel economy. Helped in all of my friends cars too you just have to make sure not to over oil them


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 10 11-25-2011 12:59 PM
start to play with IAT sensor on Mercedes E250D-Turbo 98' poisas EcoModding Central 5 10-09-2009 11:09 AM
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 22 04-07-2009 09:30 PM
Moving air intake into the engine compartment? pasadena_commut Aerodynamics 5 07-25-2008 03:24 PM
reuseable drop in air filters? Chris D. EcoModding Central 36 04-09-2008 05:04 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com