Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2010, 04:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 101

Fizz - '06 Skoda Fabia Combi
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 56.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
outside air temperature and mpg

I have been logging the fuel economy and outside air temperature for a month or so; and thought I'd try to make sense of it. There's a nice trend, a linear fit gives mpg = (0.4*temperature) +70. Nice mix of imperial mpg and degrees centigrade - that's just what we use in the UK!

I found some figures for the "dynamic viscosity" of air and so compared figures for 10 degrees C and 20 degrees C.
Air - Absolute and Kinematic Viscosity

The effect on economy is 6% (78.5 and 74mpg (imp) at 20C and 10C respectively) ... and the viscosity changes by 5.3% (3.44 and 3.5).

Convincing - provided I've chosen the right type of viscosity...

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 09:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 261 Times in 185 Posts
The benefits are more than just aero. There's faster warmup times, warmer tires, hotter air charge, and less frequent rain.

It is not necessary to concern yourself with viscosity. Aerodynamic drag varies linearly with air density. Without a datalogger, it's difficult to know how much energy you spend overcoming aerodynamic drag, versus inertia and rolling resistance, but you can use the Tools -> Calculator link at the top of the page to concoct an estimate for steady-state driving (zero inertial loads).
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 10:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,148

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 70.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 404
Thanked 322 Times in 215 Posts
I concur that there is a linear relationship between temperature and mpg. Here are my results. This is 3 years of daily commuting, so it's as consistent as the real world can be. mpg is averaged at each point.

__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 08:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,118

'04 Vibe - '04 Pontiac Vibe Base (1ZZ-FE)
90 day: 29.19 mpg (US)

'14 Prius - '14 Toyota Prius Four (2XR-FXE)
90 day: 46.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 97
Thanked 835 Times in 625 Posts
...FWIW, I have 8-months worth of AM (to work) and PM (to home) mpg-vs-temperature data showing similar results.

...there's a definite trendline difference:

• AM is cooler with slightly less traffic (at 0600 AM).

• PM is hotter with more traffic (at 1700-1800 PM).

...overall altitude difference is 220-feet over 26.2 miles, all freeway at 65 mph.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 03:12 AM   #5 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,863

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 510 Times in 343 Posts
ecoxantia -

I agree that IAT is an important component of MPG. Here is what I found :

ElmScan + Customized Scantool Software = data logging!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/187883-post20.html
Quote:
Ok, I now have a workable formula, thanks to post #9 :

Calculating MPG from VSS and MAF from OBD2 - MP3Car.com
Quote:
... For the record, the first "one-line" MPG formula above, taken from my Circuit Cellar article, is off by 100! The "4.54" should in fact be "454". The correct formula is:

MPG = (14.7 * 6.17 * 454 * VSS * 0.621371) / (3600 * MAF / 100)
MPG = 710.7 * VSS / MAF

Note that OBD-II VSS reading is in kilometers/hour and MAF reading is grams/sec times 100.

This formula works very well in a modern automobile because the engine computer spends almost 100% of its time managing the fuel-air-ratio to 14.7, which it can do very well because of the "closed loop" feedback from the O2 sensor(s).

In fact, the accuracy of this method has been proven in literally tens of thousands of gasoline-powered vehicles. Accuracy within a few percent is typical, often limited by the accuracy of the vehicle speed reading (i.e., VSS).

As for other ways of doing this, especially if you don't have a MAF sensor, by knowing the displacement of the engine, and after a simple "calibration" using fuel tank "fill-up" data to find the only unknown, namely the "volumetric efficiency" (VE) of the engine, MAF can be calculated from RPM, MAP and IAT. With VE, one can use the following formulas to calculate a synthetic "mass air-flow" (MAF) in grams per second, all without a MAF sensor, using the "Ideal Gas Law", as follows:

IMAP = RPM * MAP / IAT
MAF = (IMAP/120)*(VE/100)*(ED)*(MM)/(R)

where manifold absolute pressure (MAP) is in kPa, intake air temp (IAT) is in degrees Kelvin, R is 8.314 J/°K/mole and the average molecular mass of air (MM) is 28.97 g/mole. Note that, in the above formula, the volumetric efficiency of the (4-cycle!) engine is measured in percent and the engine displacement (ED) is in liters.

The VE of my 1999 7.4L Chevy Suburban is about 65%. Smaller, higher performance engines can have VE's of 85% or higher.

...
CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2012, 11:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
I concur that there is a linear relationship between temperature and mpg. Here are my results. This is 3 years of daily commuting, so it's as consistent as the real world can be. mpg is averaged at each point.

I know this was from a while ago, but would you be able to post the data for your graph, in a spreadsheet or equivalent?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scion xA aero mods NeilBlanchard Aerodynamics 512 09-28-2014 03:46 PM
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 15 05-23-2013 02:47 AM
Lower Air Dam Zerohour Aerodynamics 2 07-28-2010 09:04 PM
Effect of ambient temperature on fuel tank volume hummingbird Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 5 01-04-2009 10:28 PM
OEM Air Injection, Yay or nay? Dane-ger EcoModding Central 11 01-14-2008 10:05 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com