Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2017, 07:27 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 8,579
Thanks: 1,855
Thanked 2,826 Times in 2,204 Posts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitot_tube

Quote:
The example, from an Airbus A380, combines a pitot tube (right) with a static port and an angle-of-attack vane (left). Air-flow is right to left.
I've been thinking that the drip rail down the front of the doors on a VW bus is well within the frontal area. A serrated Gurney flap there would be exposed on the leeward side and could have a similar effect if it were sized appropriately — maybe 1/2" to 1 1/2" serrations? Worth a Photoshop?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-10-2017, 03:55 AM   #22 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,045

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 633 Times in 342 Posts
We can all relate to fans moving air and requiring energy to do so right???

Anyone here who does not believe a fan needs to be plugged in, using energy to turn a motor, which turns the fan blade, that makes a certain volume of air move??? Raise your hand now, and then quit reading because you're too dumb to comprehend anything.

So, if a fan requires energy to move air......we can assume that causing air to move requires power.

A truck moving through still air is going to cause the air to move, right?? Air needs to be pushed up and aside. A lower pressure area behind the truck is going to need to be filled in, causing air to rush in to fill the void so to speak. The air moving up and sideways is going to push the air beside and above the truck for tens of feet sideways and up, and the air will swirl about for many seconds after the truck has passed, seeking to be still again. Anyone driving behind a truck on a narrow road sees this happening on the grassy fields beside the road and the leafy trees overhanging it. All this jostling of the air is no different than a fan, the air is being forced to move, and how much it moves is the energy required to keep the truck moving. That is what drag is. It is the energy required to make still air move.

Please, anyone, enlighten me on how this concept of plasma makes the air move less?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-15-2017)
Old 04-10-2017, 12:40 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 8,579
Thanks: 1,855
Thanked 2,826 Times in 2,204 Posts
2nd paragraph is unnecessary.

Plasma actuators make the air move faster, locally; unless I'm too dumb to comprehend anything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 12:43 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 8,341
Thanks: 10,186
Thanked 4,376 Times in 2,425 Posts
concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
We can all relate to fans moving air and requiring energy to do so right???

Anyone here who does not believe a fan needs to be plugged in, using energy to turn a motor, which turns the fan blade, that makes a certain volume of air move??? Raise your hand now, and then quit reading because you're too dumb to comprehend anything.

So, if a fan requires energy to move air......we can assume that causing air to move requires power.

A truck moving through still air is going to cause the air to move, right?? Air needs to be pushed up and aside. A lower pressure area behind the truck is going to need to be filled in, causing air to rush in to fill the void so to speak. The air moving up and sideways is going to push the air beside and above the truck for tens of feet sideways and up, and the air will swirl about for many seconds after the truck has passed, seeking to be still again. Anyone driving behind a truck on a narrow road sees this happening on the grassy fields beside the road and the leafy trees overhanging it. All this jostling of the air is no different than a fan, the air is being forced to move, and how much it moves is the energy required to keep the truck moving. That is what drag is. It is the energy required to make still air move.

Please, anyone, enlighten me on how this concept of plasma makes the air move less?
It looks like the authors are trying to create the effect of VGs to mitigate the crosswind-induced separation bubble on the leeward side of the vehicle.

During calm conditions the 'VGs' aren't 'there',and there's no drag penalty as you'd have with say AirTabs.
For them to work though,they need to 'move' around on the body,in accordance with a fluid battle field of transient flow separation,as a function of degree of yaw.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (04-17-2017), freebeard (04-16-2017)
Old 05-19-2017, 02:27 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 8,579
Thanks: 1,855
Thanked 2,826 Times in 2,204 Posts
https://www.newscientist.com/article...ound-to-space/

I hate barely tolerate the New Scientist's dynamic, unquotable PHP, but if you Inspect Element you find:
Quote:
<meta property="og:description" content="Jet engines that compress gas into a plasma have been successfully tested at ground level for the first time">
And I can get the picture from Google Images:


https://www.google.com/search?q=plas...6SD-UJRtJ_bkM:
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2017, 08:39 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 8,579
Thanks: 1,855
Thanked 2,826 Times in 2,204 Posts
Answering myself to bump the thread. This may be important.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04054
Quote:
A new breakthrough in jet propulsion technology since the invention of the jet engine is achieved. The first critical tests for future air-breathing magneto-plasma propulsion systems have been successfully completed... Such a new pulsed plasma propulsion system driven with one thousand pulses per second would already have thrust-to-area ratios (50-150 kN/m2) of modern jet engines.
First problem seems to be it's deafening.


  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-27-2017), BamZipPow (05-22-2017), redneck (05-21-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com