Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2011, 09:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Thinner width tire for improved mpg

For the past two or so hours ive been reading all the ins and outs of low rolling resistance tires. From what I dug up the cost seems to even itself out. The extra money you spend on them will just pay for the bonus of using them. So I don't see any real gain.

BUT

people on here talk about taller tires but I havent seen any threads started about getting tires that are thinner. Example: my Mustang has 245/45/R17 stock. I could go to a 235 or I could push it with a 225. If I ran the PSI higher as I normally would id be making even less contact with the ground with the 235 than I would with the 245. Or for a car with 195/60/R15 use a 185/65/R15. I think this might be a benefit only if the thinner tires costed less or the same. Probably not worth it if they cost more.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 07:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 386
Thanks: 0
Thanked 76 Times in 61 Posts
Smithers Scientific Services conducted a whole bunch of tire tests for the califonia Energy Commission. I summarize the presentation here:

Barry's Tire Tech

About half way down, I discuss the size study and develop a formula based on the data.

RRC = 0.00246493 - 0.00000208*(Section Width in mm) - 0.00000386*(Aspect Ratio in whole numbers) - 0.00004700*(Rim Diameter in inches)

Short version: Bigger is better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 10:27 AM   #3 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Interesting stuff. Im glad you responded instead of someone else trying to make sense of a long article like that. From what I gather a wider tire can be ran at a higher pressure. And its more efficient because it can spread the load better. Is that right?

I tried to keep up with this thread but there was a massive amount of info. And just as I thought one line of thought was right another person would chime in and tear it apart. tire width vs. drag (Cd) But that was mostly about aero drag vs tire size.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 03:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,101

The Red Baron - '00 F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 37 Posts
Narrower tires make effective wheel skirts easier to do.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Hard Tonneau and Rugged Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 09:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why not buy the best Low Rolling Resistance Tires?

www dot nokiantires dot com

Jim

PS I only have 4 posts and cannot attach the proper link. I'm sorry. I will work on getting my post count up. LOLz, Jim
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 09:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroturf View Post
Why not buy the best Low Rolling Resistance Tires?

www dot nokiantires dot com

Jim

PS I only have 4 posts and cannot attach the proper link. I'm sorry. I will work on getting my post count up. LOLz, Jim
I mentioned those in the first four sentences of the first post.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 10:44 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floordford View Post
I mentioned those in the first four sentences of the first post.
Huh, I didn't see any mention of the Nokian eNtyre in your first post...

Sorry, Jim
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 11:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Short version: Bigger is better.
I find it very surprising that increasing width would decrease rolling resistance. I sure see the opposite effect on the only experiment I can conduct: road bike vs mountain bike. I run a fairly smooth road-type tread on the MB, and inflate them to their max pressure, yet it takes perceptibly more effort to maintain a given speed than with the skinny-tired road bike.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 01:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 386
Thanks: 0
Thanked 76 Times in 61 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I find it very surprising that increasing width would decrease rolling resistance. I sure see the opposite effect on the only experiment I can conduct: road bike vs mountain bike. I run a fairly smooth road-type tread on the MB, and inflate them to their max pressure, yet it takes perceptibly more effort to maintain a given speed than with the skinny-tired road bike.
The problem is apples and oranges:

Did you use the same inflation pressure?

Are the tires otherwise identical?

That's what makes that study so valuable - those things were the same.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 04:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroturf View Post
Huh, I didn't see any mention of the Nokian eNtyre in your first post...

Sorry, Jim
You mentioned low rolling resistance tires, which is what I mentioned. There is no way I could have mentioned specifically every single last tire that is deemed a low rolling resistance tire.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com