Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2011, 09:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Thinner width tire for improved mpg

For the past two or so hours ive been reading all the ins and outs of low rolling resistance tires. From what I dug up the cost seems to even itself out. The extra money you spend on them will just pay for the bonus of using them. So I don't see any real gain.

BUT

people on here talk about taller tires but I havent seen any threads started about getting tires that are thinner. Example: my Mustang has 245/45/R17 stock. I could go to a 235 or I could push it with a 225. If I ran the PSI higher as I normally would id be making even less contact with the ground with the 235 than I would with the 245. Or for a car with 195/60/R15 use a 185/65/R15. I think this might be a benefit only if the thinner tires costed less or the same. Probably not worth it if they cost more.

__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-12-2011, 07:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Smithers Scientific Services conducted a whole bunch of tire tests for the califonia Energy Commission. I summarize the presentation here:

Barry's Tire Tech

About half way down, I discuss the size study and develop a formula based on the data.

RRC = 0.00246493 - 0.00000208*(Section Width in mm) - 0.00000386*(Aspect Ratio in whole numbers) - 0.00004700*(Rim Diameter in inches)

Short version: Bigger is better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 10:27 AM   #3 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Interesting stuff. Im glad you responded instead of someone else trying to make sense of a long article like that. From what I gather a wider tire can be ran at a higher pressure. And its more efficient because it can spread the load better. Is that right?

I tried to keep up with this thread but there was a massive amount of info. And just as I thought one line of thought was right another person would chime in and tear it apart. http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...cd-7475-2.html But that was mostly about aero drag vs tire size.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 03:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Narrower tires make effective wheel skirts easier to do.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 09:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why not buy the best Low Rolling Resistance Tires?

www dot nokiantires dot com

Jim

PS I only have 4 posts and cannot attach the proper link. I'm sorry. I will work on getting my post count up. LOLz, Jim
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 09:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroturf View Post
Why not buy the best Low Rolling Resistance Tires?

www dot nokiantires dot com

Jim

PS I only have 4 posts and cannot attach the proper link. I'm sorry. I will work on getting my post count up. LOLz, Jim
I mentioned those in the first four sentences of the first post.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 10:44 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floordford View Post
I mentioned those in the first four sentences of the first post.
Huh, I didn't see any mention of the Nokian eNtyre in your first post...

Sorry, Jim
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 11:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Short version: Bigger is better.
I find it very surprising that increasing width would decrease rolling resistance. I sure see the opposite effect on the only experiment I can conduct: road bike vs mountain bike. I run a fairly smooth road-type tread on the MB, and inflate them to their max pressure, yet it takes perceptibly more effort to maintain a given speed than with the skinny-tired road bike.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 01:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I find it very surprising that increasing width would decrease rolling resistance. I sure see the opposite effect on the only experiment I can conduct: road bike vs mountain bike. I run a fairly smooth road-type tread on the MB, and inflate them to their max pressure, yet it takes perceptibly more effort to maintain a given speed than with the skinny-tired road bike.
The problem is apples and oranges:

Did you use the same inflation pressure?

Are the tires otherwise identical?

That's what makes that study so valuable - those things were the same.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 04:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroturf View Post
Huh, I didn't see any mention of the Nokian eNtyre in your first post...

Sorry, Jim
You mentioned low rolling resistance tires, which is what I mentioned. There is no way I could have mentioned specifically every single last tire that is deemed a low rolling resistance tire.

__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com