Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2011, 10:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portland, TN
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
---Wheel Cover Question---

So I have been doing some research on wheel covers and have found research that shows that with 16" wheel covers (pizza pans) there was a proven improvement in fuel economy (@ 65mph) of about 4.6%.

Now here is my question, "Is this directly related to rim size?"

I understand that the shape and design of the rim itself will yield a certain degree of positive gain but what is the yield for rim size?

SO, I have a 2004 Nissan Maxima SE and I drive about 60 miles of highway DAILY. I also have 18" rims (not hubcaps). If I put on some 18" wheel covers, how much more gain would I see?

Is there anyway to calculate this, like per inch of size difference?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2011, 01:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nummela (Finland)
Posts: 629

Siitin - '98 Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

Starppa - '96 Starlet
90 day: 35.06 mpg (US)

Aeroscania - '97 P94D 260
90 day: 9.35 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 66.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 152 Times in 73 Posts
I would say that there is no formula, because your rim design also dictates the results you will see. If you compare similar rims then you would see the difference between rim sizes, but even then the rim width changes so they are not 100% comparable. Anyway the gain is definetely more with bigger wheels. First you should show what your rims look before anyone can give even some estimation...
__________________
www.tuneko.com
Less drag = Less fuel
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2011, 01:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by firesice18 View Post
Is there anyway to calculate this, like per inch of size difference?
No.
It's just a matter of trying and seeing what it'll do for your car.
It depends too much on how much air is going through the wheels ; on the wheel design itself; on the general aerodynamic design of the front of the car and the engine bay exhaust.

Bigger wheels fill the wheel arcs better.
If you then cover the open areas of the rims, you've covered almost the entire wheel arc.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2011, 06:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by firesice18 View Post
So I have been doing some research on wheel covers and have found research that shows that with 16" wheel covers (pizza pans) there was a proven improvement in fuel economy (@ 65mph) of about 4.6%.

Now here is my question, "Is this directly related to rim size?"

I understand that the shape and design of the rim itself will yield a certain degree of positive gain but what is the yield for rim size?

SO, I have a 2004 Nissan Maxima SE and I drive about 60 miles of highway DAILY. I also have 18" rims (not hubcaps). If I put on some 18" wheel covers, how much more gain would I see?

Is there anyway to calculate this, like per inch of size difference?
I think it's a non-dimensional issue, as size just follows scaling,Wheel covers on a toy car would generate the same effect in full-scale.
In the 'mod-data' sticky there are some hard numbers on wheel covers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2011, 06:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Smooth Operator
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: dover tn
Posts: 74

Old Yellar - '79 Tourer Drop-Hood Coupé
90 day: 30.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
would these work as good as pizza pans ?
i need to search for the data , 4% sounds nice
Experiment: smooth wheel discs tested A-B-A - 4.6% mpg improvement @ 65 mph

baby moons



16 inch moons on this machine
Hubcaps Wheel Covers | Hubcap Mike's | Buy New Hub Caps Online

Last edited by MGB=MPG; 02-21-2011 at 07:11 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 12:48 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portland, TN
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Would a cloth cover yield the same type of gain as a metal or solid material cover? Something tightly and evenly stretched over the rim, not just some home made crap. Ideas?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 01:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Yes, the convex shape apparently is even beneficial.

If they stay on, that is.
Hub caps have a tendency to part ways with the wheels.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 01:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by firesice18 View Post
Would a cloth cover yield the same type of gain as a metal or solid material cover? Something tightly and evenly stretched over the rim, not just some home made crap. Ideas?
These are being used over the spoked wheels on velomobiles (covered recumbent cycles)

The fabric needs to be (made) windproof though.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
euromodder -

Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Yes, the convex shape apparently is even beneficial.

If they stay on, that is.
Hub caps have a tendency to part ways with the wheels.
Yes, that is my experience, especially with the style that has those little "grabby" teeth around the edge. Over time the teeth will fatigue. They also make scritch-scritch sounds against that steel wheel as you drive, which could get on your nerves.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 09:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
Smooth Operator
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: dover tn
Posts: 74

Old Yellar - '79 Tourer Drop-Hood Coupé
90 day: 30.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
smoothie wheel covers installed



(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg moons (Medium).jpg (70.0 KB, 38 views)
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com