View Single Post
Old 02-20-2008, 08:10 PM   #44 (permalink)
presidential
EcoModding Lurker
 
presidential's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yeah, just lower it is my suggestion.

Dunno why everyone around here is so set on the stock ride height. Why not have an economical car that can actually go around a corner or be stable in weird crosswinds?

Maybe I'm just too much of a racer at heart who likes capable vehicles in more than one sense.
__________________
~Craig
1992 Nissan 240sx (32+mpg)
1982 AMC Jeep Wagoneer (19 mpg highway)
1964 Pontiac Catalina 455 (0 mpg, doesn't move)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to presidential For This Useful Post:
Domman56 (02-04-2010)