View Single Post
Old 06-11-2009, 02:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
The airflow near the front tires is rarely travelling straight towards them, so the design of successful tire deflectors may not be intuitive.

High pressure at the bumper may be forcing flow both down and outwards, which is one reason why OEM spats don't extend out to the edge of the tires (they'd be overkill if they did, pushing air further out than necessary).

Some OEM spats that are angled similar to your Figure B would be subject to perpendicular flow! (Of course, it depends on the vehicle.)

One Volvo study found that even very small changes in spat size / positioning can have a negative effect (increase drag). I'll see if I can dig it up...

This is a tough one to guess at!
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote