07-06-2009, 10:48 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
What's interesting is when the car came out, the official line for going with the 1.8 was it permitted better highway fuel economy because its greater torque = lower RPM.
Which may be true.
But now they're saying something entirely different about the engine choice.
Piwoslaw: wouldn't it be interesting if they offered the "old" 1.5 in the new body style?
|
|
|
|