View Single Post
Old 09-10-2009, 03:14 AM   #11 (permalink)
lunarhighway
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 663

vectra a - '95 Opel Vectra GLS
90 day: 37.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts
imagine the top of you car looks like this.. noone would buy it (unless your into hummers)

what i don't get is why, at least on these cars where aero is a big thing, like the prius etc, they don't start the design with a clean smooth bottom shell, and then cut out some holes for the exhaust, and chop the shell up in managable bits...

right now it seems like they build the car and than patched up all the holes... some coroplast jobs over here are smoother.

afterall isn't that how the top of a car is designed? you start with a concept sketch do some computer modeling, build a real mock up an a test version, and along the way deside how the panel lines should go and the whole thing will be broken up into bits that can be mass produced and assembeled. so if that production process works so well why not use it on the bottom as well?

the only reason i can think of why the bottom looks like this is that the difference between this and a smooth cover is very small, but that is hard to believe

__________________
aer·o·dy·nam·ics: the science of passing gass

*i can coast for miles and miles and miles*
  Reply With Quote