View Single Post
Old 03-07-2008, 09:26 AM   #18 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I predict you, like the others before you, will not be able to detect an FE difference from before to after.
I agree. BUT...

I think it's important to point out that just because you can't discern a difference in tank to tank comparisons, it doesn't mean they don't work. The difference is just likely smaller than the normal variation in your fills.

That's no reason not to do it. There are myriad small aero changes a person could do that are too small to detect individually by watching the fuel gauge, but done together, they likely add up to a measurable change.

Whether smooth wheel covers make a difference depends on the vehicle & wheel style. I'd wager these wheels are on the "bad" end of aerodynamic and worth covering up.

BTW, Frank - have you seen anyone test smooth wheel covers in a somewhat controlled way? (I haven't.)
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote