View Single Post
Old 10-01-2009, 05:04 PM   #29 (permalink)
darcane
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Atomic Ass View Post
Well, yeah, that's the way it's designed. That's the price to pay for buying from a company that's in bed with the oil companies.

On a serious note, it's extremely difficult to get any better with GM's large-displacement, slush-boxed trucks. It can be done, but it's still tough.
You've got your little smilie up there... but I see this sort of thing a lot about GM trucks. I just don't understand why.

I needed a full size truck that can seat my whole family and tow a decent sized trailer. That meant a V8 and an extended cab, full size truck. Go over to fueleconomy.gov - advanced search and limit your search to 2001 2wd gas pickups with 6-8 cylinders and an auto. What's the first you see with a V8? GM...

You can do this with most years and see GM or Ford as the first on the list. A major reason I picked a Chevy because it was the most efficient truck in the class I was looking for.

-Mike
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote