View Single Post
Old 12-07-2009, 02:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
The suggestion that they're saying supports that glass is fluid is simply that glass is able to transfer light cleanly. All other true solids in nature cannot.
Not so. Most non-metallic crystals (and crystals by definition are true solids) will transmit light. Quartz crystals, salt, sugar, diamond... Every individual crystal transmits light, it's the reflections off the myriad non-parallel surfaces that gives the bulk material its white appearance.

As for the "old glass is thicker at the bottom because it flows" myth, that comes from old stained glass windows in European cathedrals (some of which might be close to a thousand years old). But the window makers were just (quite sensibly) putting in the glass with the thick ends down.

There are likewise glass objects - beads and such - from archeological sites, and natural volcanic glasses such as obsidian. If glass did flow enough to be noticed in American windows that are only a few hundred years old at most, why haven't these much older glasses dribbled away?
  Reply With Quote