12-27-2009, 11:52 PM
|
#358 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
I personally liked the theory that the weight of the tail caused the front end to lift, allowing more air underneath which reduced rolling resistance, thus the MPG gain (at least I think that's what he was saying).
When I said I thought they were decent on average, I was thinking in terms of what I would have expected to read on other forums. EG: AutoblogGreen commenters would have been worse, I think.
|
|
|