View Single Post
Old 01-07-2010, 12:21 PM   #17 (permalink)
Domman56
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Gimme a break, man... the guy didn't install that filter for economy, he installed it because he thought it would get him somewhere in the HP department. Of course, real tuners and anyone that knows how engines work know that he's now starving his engine at higher RPMs, under heavy loading, because the air gets so hot it has the same mass as the colder air at lower RPMs.

The difference is that on his vehicle, there probably is no air mass measurement, it's based on a MAP sensor, which means he's getting stupid rich mixtures at high RPM/load curves, further polluting the country.

I seriously doubt if he's getting any better fuel economy, either. Butt-dyno, my friend. That's all it is. And that's a ricer mod, done by someone less concerned with fuel economy than Clinton was with the state of affairs outside his little circle (oval?)...
haha i would agree with you. and i do on all the info but i've riden with him lol and he can't afford to drive the car like that it actually was done for fuel economy because he's a broke college student

With the MAP it will compensate the extra airflow by adding fuel right? that's why it pollutes more?
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote