Quote:
Originally Posted by stonebreaker
Hey, have you heard about a program called Desktop Dyno? I use it a lot to compare various performance modifications. Seems to me it would benefit your situation by allowing you to test a lot of virtual cams. The rest of your stuff sounds like it would be rather difficult to translate to the programming parameters, but the cam stuff should still work pretty well.
And this whole thread is cool as hell.
|
I have that program... the free version of it doesn't work all that great, and it takes forever to perform even low-resolution tests with multiple iterations, but it gives you an idea, I guess.
The paid version, supposedly, has much more "tunability" to it, so it should be more accurate.
Neither version allows "weird" stuff, though, like offset mains and such, or multiple cam profiles (a la Vtec, etc.), and things like that, and the free version doesn't give (as far as I know) any variability on AFR's, it just assumes that you'll be running in a "normal" way.