View Single Post
Old 04-17-2010, 02:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Are you suggesting we add extra mirrors, since the result would be "only" a 2-4% increase in fuel consumption?
Nope, not suggesting that.

Just sayin', I don't want complicated, expensive, relatively unreliable systems to replace simple, cheap, proven ones for a fractional mpg gain (ex. 33 mpg x 1.02 = 33.66. And as I noted somewhere here on EM re: sidewinds I'm not so sure these mirror drag effects could be proven at all anyway).

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...s-11580-2.html



I suspect I drive through x-wind yaw more severe than depicted most of the time. How much "frontal" area and drag are these mirrors adding? I bet the downwind mirror adds 0 to drag; while the upwind one may add zero to frontal area but may add some form drag...
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 04-17-2010 at 02:52 PM..
  Reply With Quote