Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2009, 12:44 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
In crosswinds, I think the odds are that a belly pan would show slightly more improvement relative to skirts. But aero on anything but pure shapes is full of surprises.

"Anyone who has ever ridden a racing bike (or even done hiking) knows this: if the wind is at your back, it's a gift. If you are headed into the wind or blown sideways by it, it's a drag... literally.

Now, maybe if our cars had adjustable sails... "

Most rigid-wing land sailers don't adjust for wind direction, they just work. Life is different in an airfol than a human body.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-31-2009, 01:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,886
Thanks: 23,965
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
Epa

In the late 1970s the EPA published a table showing the effect of an 18-mph wind as a tailwind,crosswind,and tailwind.
I've meant to post it.I do think the data is in the seminars though.
SAE criteria for coastdown tests limit crosswind testing to fairly low windspeed because of the difficulty of reducing the data.
If memory serves me,if any run has a standard deviation of 2 % or greater ( and crosswind will effect this ),that data must be discarded.They're very stringent.
Dead flat course and zero wind is almost absolutely necessary when you see the mathematics necessary to compensate for more than one variable.
If you've got no plans for the rest of your life,then I'd say go for it.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
JacobLeSann (11-20-2023)
Old 03-10-2010, 12:22 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4

Brooks Fit (HRA) - '09 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 38.98 mpg (US)

Geoizm - '96 GM GEO PRIZM
Last 3: 48.93 mpg (US)

2G Insight (2014) - '14 Honda Insight
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Stability in Cross Wind

I am drawing up "boat tail" plans for my new project car 96 Geo Metro.
I am concerned about the side area increase by elongating the rear.
Can someone who drives a "boat tail" comment on the stability or instability feeling while driving in cross wind?
Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 12:27 AM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If it's properly boattailed, the side area doesn't necessarily increase. Depends on speed vs windspeed and angle, but plan for the most common condition in your area.

Here's how I visualize it (with sort of off-the-cuff numbers): Look at the vehicle from the front, offset at, oh, 10 degrees. That is what the x-wind sees (pic 1):







Looks like proper tapering in plan view added exactly ZERO to yawed "frontal" area and thus shouldn't adversely effect stability.

Perhaps this is 5 degrees yaw?



Perhaps this is why outside mirrors don't hurt drag much in the real world? (not adding much "frontal area" at all)
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 03-10-2010 at 05:11 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 06:55 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088

Aerocivic - '92 Honda Civic CX
Last 3: 70.54 mpg (US)

AerocivicLB - '92 Honda Civic CX
Team Honda
90 day: 55.14 mpg (US)

Camryglide - '20 Toyota Camry hybrid LE
90 day: 62.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 676 Times in 302 Posts
My car is a little more sensitive to crosswinds than before the boattail was installed, but nowhere near as sensitive as my old VW bug used to be.
__________________
aerocivic.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 06:08 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,886
Thanks: 23,965
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
comment

Quote:
Originally Posted by stretch-hyper-commuter View Post
I am drawing up "boat tail" plans for my new project car 96 Geo Metro.
I am concerned about the side area increase by elongating the rear.
Can someone who drives a "boat tail" comment on the stability or instability feeling while driving in cross wind?
Thanks
My VW bus saw nothing funny.The CRX is rock solid.The T-100 is rock solid,and the full boat tail trailer pulled with no surprises in 15-mph crosswinds.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 06:12 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,886
Thanks: 23,965
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
3-wheeler

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
If it's properly boattailed, the side area doesn't necessarily increase. Depends on speed vs windspeed and angle, but plan for the most common condition in your area.

Here's how I visualize it (with sort of off-the-cuff numbers): Look at the vehicle from the front, offset at, oh, 10 degrees. That is what the x-wind sees (pic 1):







Looks like proper tapering in plan view added exactly ZERO to yawed "frontal" area and thus shouldn't adversely effect stability.

Perhaps this is 5 degrees yaw?



Perhaps this is why outside mirrors don't hurt drag much in the real world? (not adding much "frontal area" at all)
Frank,I just wanted to thank you for the pics of the red 3-wheeler.That vehicle should be in a thread by itself.It's aft-body looks dead on! Thanks mucho!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2010, 10:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I heart that trike but unfortunately have zero info on it- just those three pics.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 12:31 AM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
puddleglum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421

Rondo - '07 Kia Rondo EX
Last 3: 20.47 mpg (US)

Tinkertoy2 - '00 Toyota Echo base
Team Toyota
Last 3: 46.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
Crosswinds are almost always mor

I came across this link yesterday that illustrates crosswinds effect on mileage quite well. I'm guessing the hit would be even greater on a larger car with a worse Cd.
__________________



Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to puddleglum For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-27-2010), Assiduous (02-09-2024), Bicycle Bob (03-27-2010), cfg83 (03-28-2010), Frank Lee (03-27-2010)
Old 03-27-2010, 01:29 AM   #20 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Crabbing the whole car into the wind is an interesting concept, but I have to wonder if it would lead to more accidents- would crabbing down the road disorient drivers?

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Testing: WAI's effect on engine warm up Daox EcoModding Central 24 01-13-2011 09:41 PM
SAE Paper 800087 – The Effect of Inflation Pressure on Bias, Bias-Belted, and Radial CapriRacer Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 18 07-06-2008 06:36 PM
Tips: corridor effect question joycebgood Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 13 05-29-2008 03:15 PM
Smooth Road Effect newtonsfirstlaw General Efficiency Discussion 7 01-16-2008 05:37 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com