View Single Post
Old 05-21-2010, 09:52 AM   #24 (permalink)
COcyclist
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by autoteach View Post
Turbo engines do operate under different principles. The critical portions are the header/manifold up to the turbo, which people typically leave alone, and the pressure difference between either side of the exhaust turbine, which dictates lift on the blades, which effects rpm-boost-power, and so on. There are points of diminishing returns, where the bigger pipes net no increase in power.
So Autoteach, I read the Exhaust Theory 101 and I get the exhaust scavenging concept. But in a turbo car, does this mean that the whirring turbine blades eliminate the pulses at the turbo and therefore from that point on bigger is better, even for ecodriving? A 3" exhaust on a 1.9 TDI could increase mpg at light engine loads?
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote