View Single Post
Old 06-11-2010, 11:50 AM   #20 (permalink)
doviatt
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Airtabs or vortex generators were not designed or intended to reduce drag or increase forward efficiency in any way (originally). I would guess the origination of this claim of efficiency came from the product web site for cars. We all should know they originally appeared on airplane wings to help keep airflow from separating from the wing for the purpose of lift. This being in a vertical direction. It only takes someone with a marketing mind, sitting on an airplane, looking out the windows, noticing those tabs, thinking "I wonder what those are for". Then his marketing mind starts to engage and his motive is "I can sell these, they look cool. What can I use as the selling point?" Since cars do not benefit from improved vertical lift near the stall speed at critical angle of attack...;-)
...make up something....

They just add more drag. Period. Even on those airplane wings they add more drag. The trade off is better near stall performance at low (landing speeds) with attached airflow. They have no benefit at higher cruise speed. Just more drag.

I'm glad the testing is being done though. All ideas should be tested.

Last edited by doviatt; 06-11-2010 at 12:20 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to doviatt For This Useful Post:
Cd (06-12-2010)