Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer
Yup, there's an 18% difference between the 2 tests, but only a 0.3% error between the tests.
This points to the need to compare RR values using the same test.
|
...it's actually worse than that; the
"...Range of all tires used for this example: ISO = 1.13*SAE to 1.22*SAE" ...the 18% value (1.1787(x)-number) was just the
mean value, however the correlation coefficient of R-squared = 0.9972 is very good.
...but, your summary is 100% correct. Do we compare small
apples or BIG
apples to those SMALL- and big-
oranges?!?!