View Single Post
Old 06-28-2010, 03:35 PM   #40 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I'm curious if anyone had trained on a recumbent long enough to adjust to how much power that can be extracted from human torque. I suspected it would pull the power right out of you but we are a hardy and adaptable species.

The closest I can imagine a standard bicycle coming to the peak torque possible from the recumbent design is when toe clips are used. I've used them before, and once I became accustomed to the extra effort and concentration required, I could go faster, but at full wick it would sap me rather well.

I wonder if a small flywheel attached to the crank that spins, say 3x crank rpms, would help spread the torque output? It would elimintate or reduce the surges, and I suspect when properly engineered wouldn't have to weigh much to help.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote