Thread: Truckers
View Single Post
Old 04-06-2008, 08:26 AM   #23 (permalink)
elhigh
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 50.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
I don't agree that rolling resistance is a bigger issue, though it's pretty obvious that with 18 wheels, there's a heck of a lot more rolling resistance on a truck than a car. Add a full load and it gets worse.

With those big gaps, the enormous open belly with girders and spares and tanks hanging in the breeze, and the bluff nose and tail, the aero of a truck is accurately described as "brick-like," if the brick had a few extra cracks added to it.

My understanding is that rolling resistance increases as a linear progression, but aero is a exponential progression. So the rolling load increases, but not as fast as aero drag does.

Trucks are just about the most inefficient way to get bulk goods from here to there. For distribution inside a city they make great sense, but for anything longer than 200 miles I'd say load it on a train.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote