View Single Post
Old 08-01-2010, 04:49 PM   #12 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Essentially, a big engine doing no work is more efficient than a smaller engine doing lots of work.

A big engine doing no work would be "off".

In a pair of hypothetical vehicles who's only difference is big vs small engine, the "work" requirement to move them down the road would be equal. Well... if we bend that "equal" a bit, the small engined version would have a bit less drivetrain loss due to the relatively smaller components.
__________________


  Reply With Quote