Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2010, 04:05 AM   #11 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Not sure about the looks. It reminds me of a TVR which has been left on a radiator and has melted in the middle.

I wondered how they could get this

at 30mph, Trident's initial tests returned 108mpg

when my 1.9 gets about 60-80. Then I read this

Torque multiplication keeps a car's rev range low. It is this that decreases fuel consumption and reduces emissions. For example, at 70mph, the Iceni is running at 980 rpm whereas the average car runs at between 2500 and 3500 rpm at 70mph. This means a 6.6l V8 can be more economical than a 2.0l. Essentially, a big engine doing no work is more efficient than a smaller engine doing lots of work.

which suggests they are going for the big engine / little car theory.

This is only unique until Audi get that R8 V10 TDi thing going. The last thing I read on it was that they didn't have a gearbox to handle the torque.

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-01-2010, 04:49 PM   #12 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Essentially, a big engine doing no work is more efficient than a smaller engine doing lots of work.

A big engine doing no work would be "off".

In a pair of hypothetical vehicles who's only difference is big vs small engine, the "work" requirement to move them down the road would be equal. Well... if we bend that "equal" a bit, the small engined version would have a bit less drivetrain loss due to the relatively smaller components.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 04:07 AM   #13 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
True, but I meant in relation to the gearing. Mountain of torque + light car means you can have really long gearing. Smaller engine, less torque you have to compromise with shorter gearing.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 06:21 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
yup
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 06:37 PM   #15 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Looks like this awesome, diesel sports car is coming to America:
This Beautiful Diesel Sportscar Is Coming To America
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 08:22 PM   #16 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...wonder what its aero Cd number is?


Last edited by gone-ot; 05-01-2014 at 01:04 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2014, 03:43 PM   #17 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
That's an amazing car, too bad it wouldn't be street-legal neither in Brazil or Uruguay...
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2014, 04:02 PM   #18 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
That's an amazing car, too bad it wouldn't be street-legal neither in Brazil or Uruguay...
Not being familiar with your laws... what would disqualify it?
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2014, 04:25 PM   #19 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
Not being familiar with your laws... what would disqualify it?
Since '93, Diesel engines are only allowed in Brazil for vehicles with a payload of at least one metric ton, with the only exemptions granted to vehicles with either hi-lo 4WD or seats for at least 9 passengers (not considering the driver's seat). Actually there was a ban on new light-duty Diesels in Brazil in '76, but aftermarket conversions ((mostly for coupe-utilities and station wagons) were still not so unusual. Uruguay imposed this rule more recently, about 2 or 3 years ago.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2014, 02:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Since '93, Diesel engines are only allowed in Brazil for vehicles with a payload of at least one metric ton, with the only exemptions granted to vehicles with either hi-lo 4WD or seats for at least 9 passengers (not considering the driver's seat). Actually there was a ban on new light-duty Diesels in Brazil in '76, but aftermarket conversions ((mostly for coupe-utilities and station wagons) were still not so unusual. Uruguay imposed this rule more recently, about 2 or 3 years ago.
Well, that is an unfortunate law. Is it ostensibly intended to improve emissions?

__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com