View Single Post
Old 08-04-2010, 06:45 AM   #57 (permalink)
suspectnumber961
EcoModding Alien Observer
 
suspectnumber961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I flitter here and there
Posts: 547

highcountryexplorer - '86 Nissan 720 KC 4x4 ST with fiberglass cap
90 day: 21.78 mpg (US)

Elroy - '03 Ford Focus ZX3 w/Zetec DOHC engine
90 day: 32.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 78 Times in 65 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post

In Los Angeles, smog was terrible. There wasn't sufficient rain to make the acid rain that cleans the air. This picture was taken shortly before I was born in the city I was born. Asthma has been a scourge in my life since.

So tell me, why is it acceptable to disable pollution control devices, including removing the catalytic convertor, for the sake of saving a couple dollars in gas?
There are other considerations when honestly computing the "pollution" contribution of a vehicle?

It takes energy and it's accompanying pollution to find oil and refine and ship gasoline...and a large war machine to guarantee a continuing supply. You'll notice that he has
doubled his mpg from the EPA mileage for this car?

I'd guess that on a per mile basis he is putting out less pollutants than the OEM setup...not to mention 1/2 the pollution costs leading up to the gasoline's actual use. That 100% increase in efficiency comes from somewhere?

On the other hand...I sort of doubt that running with no converter actually helps mpg much.
__________________
Carry on humans...we are extremely proud of you. ..................

Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the creationist view that God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. GALLUP POLL
  Reply With Quote