View Single Post
Old 08-16-2010, 02:03 PM   #25 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
The adult deer around here have a live weight of 225-270. Hit that at 100 mph and it is sent into the drivers compartment rather instantly.

Most (over 50%) that live in the my neighborhood drive a truck or SUV, I am sure that not a one of us enjoys paying the 70 dollars for a tank of gas but it is a necessity.

The topic for this site is improving mileage, I made comments on why personally I can't own a honda car or the like and get told by experts who likely have never driven on a rutted gravel road that I just need to steer around a deer.
Then don't go 100 mph.

Most (over 50%) here drive trucks and SUVs too, and seeing as how they are empty most of the time while they are putting on 100 miles/day within city limits, it appears they do enjoy it. :/

The topic for this site is improving mileage yet all you've talked about so far is going from small vehicles to big ones, then adding battering-ram armour to those, in response to a perceived threat on your safety, with no evidence that the big vehicles provide any safety advantage anyway. Then you failed to contradict given statistics- which are presumably accurate- as to the real danger you are exposed to, which gives insight into the odds of encountering such a deer strike.

Forgive my confusion.
__________________


  Reply With Quote