View Single Post
Old 08-27-2010, 07:46 PM   #22 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,468

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
redpoint5, where is your source? The burden is on you to prove your numbers (ethanol is not guilty until proven otherwise).
Here, as well as any other website you might find:
Exact Low Energy Content of Ethanol

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnemy View Post
Actually red is correct pure ethanol has about 66% the energy of regular gas.

The problem with his statement is that we are running E-10, the difference in energy between E-10 and E-0 is only about 3.5%. So if your getting 50mpg, you should loose only 1.75mpg. Some cars like one of mine lost more because they don't seem to like E-10 for some reason or another.

One thing to keep in mind is if you are running E-100 you would have an octain of 122, in which you could run a much higher compression and possibly more than offset the lower energy per gallon.

Ethanol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Formula 1 car, yes please. MPG be damned. Actually, an efficient car could probably be made using pure ethanol for the very reasons you mentioned. It would be interesting to see how far that technology could go, although I don't think it can make up for the 1/3 energy density hit.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote