|
UFO you are wrong. It is a know FACT indisputable that these older vehicles are in fact NOT compatible with E10 hence why so many of them have failing "fuel" systems as a direct result of the incompatibility of their rubber/plastic components to the effects of ethanol. The government and auto makers simply IGNORE this for their own profits. Many of them can BARELY tolerate E10 and fail promptly when some douche fubar's the mixture to higher than 10% (I have measured in excess of 10% on NUMEROUS occasions as high as 13%)
My Compression is quite good (185 all 3 cylinders as of 1 month ago) well within spec. Timing is advanced to stock. Vac pressure is perfect with ZERO flutter Are you simply ignoring my posts? Or ignoring data that is inconvenient to you?
The data says its the fuel. I am right and you are wrong until you can show me data to the contrary. Please do so now.
Heck the Engine in the Cherokee is newly rebuild and running like a top only 15,000 miles on it since the rebuild. NOTE it got 22mpg by its third tank of fuel after rebuild and held that until the switch to E10.
this also does NOT explain why they all run "just fine" when I STOP using E10 and use E0.
you are simply wrong unless you can show me data to the contrary of what I am finding for all 10 of these vehicles.
|