Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Closed Thread  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-18-2010, 06:59 PM   #241 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Nerys,

You are wrong when you say your car is not designed to run on E10. 10% ethanol does not change the fuel properties that much, and ethanol runs just fine in SI engines, even with low compression and retarded timing such as yours must have. My long past 1976 Civic ran just fine on it.

As long as the octane rating is comparable, the most mileage loss you should expect from a properly tuned engine burning E10 is 1-2%.

 
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-18-2010, 07:27 PM   #242 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
UFO you are wrong. It is a know FACT indisputable that these older vehicles are in fact NOT compatible with E10 hence why so many of them have failing "fuel" systems as a direct result of the incompatibility of their rubber/plastic components to the effects of ethanol. The government and auto makers simply IGNORE this for their own profits. Many of them can BARELY tolerate E10 and fail promptly when some douche fubar's the mixture to higher than 10% (I have measured in excess of 10% on NUMEROUS occasions as high as 13%)

My Compression is quite good (185 all 3 cylinders as of 1 month ago) well within spec. Timing is advanced to stock. Vac pressure is perfect with ZERO flutter Are you simply ignoring my posts? Or ignoring data that is inconvenient to you?

The data says its the fuel. I am right and you are wrong until you can show me data to the contrary. Please do so now.

Heck the Engine in the Cherokee is newly rebuild and running like a top only 15,000 miles on it since the rebuild. NOTE it got 22mpg by its third tank of fuel after rebuild and held that until the switch to E10.

this also does NOT explain why they all run "just fine" when I STOP using E10 and use E0.

you are simply wrong unless you can show me data to the contrary of what I am finding for all 10 of these vehicles.
 
Old 10-18-2010, 08:01 PM   #243 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Nerys,

You are wrong when you say your car is not designed to run on E10. 10% ethanol does not change the fuel properties that much, and ethanol runs just fine in SI engines, even with low compression and retarded timing such as yours must have. My long past 1976 Civic ran just fine on it.

As long as the octane rating is comparable, the most mileage loss you should expect from a properly tuned engine burning E10 is 1-2%.
You are 100% correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerys View Post
The data says its the fuel. I am right and you are wrong until you can show me data to the contrary. Please do so now.
Spoken like a true 5 year old.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerys View Post
this also does NOT explain why they all run "just fine" when I STOP using E10 and use E0.
Maybe the problem is with the nut behind the wheel.
 
Old 10-18-2010, 08:22 PM   #244 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerys View Post
The pinging IS FROM THE E10 I think (not my area of expertise). when I get E0 it stops pinging. (at least it did back then)
pinging is from the gas igniting before the spark plugs light up. This is due to an octane rating lower than needed by the engine. Sometimes fluctuations in engine conditions, such as carbon build up in the combustion chamber or on the pistons, will cause the octane knock (aka pinging)

If the fuel ratio has gotten too lean for some reason, or you got into some crappy gas, this can also be a problem. If one injector is in need of a cleaning, that could lean out a cylinder. Regardless of the cause, pinging is to be avoided. If it gets bad enough, the flame from the preignited gas can burn a hole in a piston. This happened to me on an Isuzu pickup. Luckily I was able to get it repaired for free. But the short term solution is to put in some higher octane fuel until the problem is solved. I usually will go to 89 octane if I have a problem. If you have a partial tank, add 93 octane if you can find it--out here Exxon is the only one who carries it.

I have a homemade fuel injector cleaner recipe if you're interested that usually will fetch an extra 2-3 mpg for the tank I put it in. The ingredients can be bought for less than $10 at any grocery store.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
 
Old 10-18-2010, 08:35 PM   #245 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerys View Post
My Compression is quite good (185 all 3 cylinders as of 1 month ago) well within spec. Timing is advanced to stock. Vac pressure is perfect with ZERO flutter Are you simply ignoring my posts? Or ignoring data that is inconvenient to you?
On the contrary, it's your data that has helped me form my conclusions. Fuel properties are well known; your data points to an engine issue or it's wrong, I don't know. Anyway I will not respond in kind. Have a nice day.
 
Old 10-18-2010, 10:34 PM   #246 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
all 10 engines? your seriously saying all 10 engines are suffering from exactly the same ailment? do you know how insane that sounds? how improbable that is? Never mind don't bother answering you will just come up with some nonsensical answer.

-----

Hmm I tried higher octane ones and it did not go away. I also noticed my pops towncar is making a similar noise but his is only when UNDER load ie hit the gas.

I really can not figure out how to describe the noise. I have tried to record it but its always drowned out by compression and or ambient noise.

I am assuming its pinging but maybe its not??? its sounds vaguely like boiling water if it were altered to have a tinny sound to it. or a very very soft mild "marbles in a can" sound. really hard to describe.

its TBI and the cylinders are clean (checked visually) I seafoam regularly since I am told these engines coke up really easily.

I will try a tank of higher octane fuel and see what happens.

Sure post the recipe. I am darned near empty now (under 1 gallon in the tank) so I will fill up tomorrow with high octane and see what happens with the noise.
 
Old 10-18-2010, 10:36 PM   #247 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
You are 100% correct.


Spoken like a true 5 year old.

Maybe the problem is with the nut behind the wheel.
Hey I did not start that spat

"Nerys,
You are wrong when you say your car is not designed to run on E10."

I just returned it back at him to show how silly such a response is. so its "5 year old behaviour" when I do it but its ok when he does it? really?
 
Old 10-18-2010, 10:40 PM   #248 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
Sadly, I fear our esteemed friend is unwilling to relent on the evils of ethanol.....
Exactly if its bad for his Chrysler product its bad for all other vehicles.

We know this not to be true, but he may well be getting exactly what he is posting, I am worldly enough to know there can be reasons for fuel economy increases from simple and not apparent things. The reason for his economy increases could be something other than he realizes.

But we also know that certain vehicles for whatever reason perform poorly on alcohol. I tend to believe on most vehicles that are newer than 1975 its because of the motor not being in perfect condition. However my 1970 subaru 360 on ethanol gas gets mild vapor lock which leans the mix and burns holes in pistons, no good way around this has been found on a variety of gravity fed engines including my subaru which has an unfortunate and uncorrectable routing of the fuel line.

That said my subaru does get fair fuel economy on ethanol, it just tends to lean out and ping after it heats up and for me thankfully shut off before self destruction. And it appears to be true of all Subaru 360's. This is also true of other historic vehicles, but his I wouldn't qualify as historic.

The thing is he is also exaggerating the implications of his test, just because his set of cars behave one way after a water wash does not mean all or even many cars will behave the same way. Knowledge is knowledge It is possible that others may benefit from water washed gas though or potentially desludging and retuning their engines as a result of this thread. If it works for him let him run with it. I would like to see several years of his water washed gas data side by side with several years of plain alcohol and plain e0 gasoline usage gas slips.

Also I was told on another forum that water washing gas in of itself (with or without alcohol) may cause a bit of a fuel economy improvement as it increases apparent octane levels (aka you never get the suspended water out and this reduces the likelyhood of detonation)

Using water washed gas can also cause slow pitting and corosion inside the carb and motor though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 123 View Post
As for electric cars I like them and have worked on building/converting EVs but they have their own problems. Most electricity produced is not clean or green and very inefficient to produce. Another problem with EVs is batteries, what about all the energy to mine refine and ship from other parts of the world. What do we do with all the dead batteries?

UFO as for cellulose ethanol I am not buying into that just yet. Millions of dollars have been spent on research over many years and still no tried and true method for making it. Also the one who patents the organism/process to make cellulose ethanol has all the control.
Billions were spent on fossil fuels before they became perfected and commonplace. I am not against investment, I am against poorly managed investment though. We need many alternatives to start removing the monopoly placed on us.

And your coal comment is plain wrong, coal powered electric plants run about double the efficiency of a typical car, meaning less fuel and less carbon per unit of energy produced are required by the coal plant and thus even the coal plant is less polluting than the average gasoline engine. (assuming they follow the law regarding pollution controls which some ignore like the local Weston 4 plant that rather pay fines than use scrubbers on its brand new facility)

I would personally prefer to see coal plants required to vent their exhaust directly into an micro algae pond for the purpose of creating biofuels. Forcing this would clean up coal and increase the available amounts of feed stock biodiesel oils. (heck they may even find they make money on the venture)

Biofuels are real and to me could be a viable alternative if they were perfected (production methods) or if our motors were perfected to use them. I also could never understand why e85 cars don't use a variable valve timing system similar to the prius to take advantage of high compression with e85 and lower compression for e10 compatibility.

Most everyone here knows the current corn ethanol system is a rather mixed bag to say the least, I can't in my heart discount negative emotions toward it since it takes a lot of explaining to show its worthwhile and does have negative downsides because we are doing it wrong AKA fertalizer, pesticides, poor farming practices and poor production methods. I also can't loose hope that better methods, better sources of and even better types of biofuels won't be developed over time overcoming pricing, pollution and efficacy issues.

Cheers
Ryan May
 
Old 10-18-2010, 11:03 PM   #249 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
I don't think I have any Chrysler vehicles?? I am not fond of Chrysler its why I won't buy a Cherokee newer than 1988.

4 fords. 2 AMC's 1 Suzuki 2 Chevy's 1 Plymouth (is that Chrysler?) and a Kia

These results are NOT from washed gas!. They are from regular PUMPED E0 87 octane gasoline.

I did the washing as a test STRICTLY to determine if it was worth the 3 hours round trip $15 in tolls and $140 in prepaid gasoline.

I got "slightly" smaller increases (compared to real E0) in FE with the washed gas but it was enough to make the trip up to womelsdorf with the trailer and 5 gallons cans worth a try.

I am reluctant to do long term "washing" until I can figure out the ramifications to my engines.
 
Old 10-19-2010, 12:21 AM   #250 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Running a 73 VW and two motorcycles on E10 without issues.

Indy cars run E85 now, used to be straight alcohol.

Drag racers run alcohol, gas and nitro methane.

On the Corolla trip. I was driving 65 in Va, started at 3AM so headlights were on as well.
After the refill in Pennsylvania, speed limits were 55 and 45 on the turnpike with lots of construction to slow down my average speed. In Ohio speed limits was 55 with cops all over the place.

Understanding those circumstances the 10% difference in mileage is mostly attributable to the lower average speeds and no electrical drain for headlights.

36.5 and 39.5 less than 10% even with the lower speeds and lower electrical loads.

I like Ryan's idea of variable valve timing with increased compression for alcohol blends.
The X prize winners Edison were running E85.

Alcohol requires different jets and or emulsion tubes in older E0 setup carburetors.

That's 60k hours experience speaking.

Not a single snide or nasty comment.

Just facts based on 40 years experience.

regards
Mech

 
Closed Thread  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to get to the bottom of this ethanol killing my mpg Nerys General Efficiency Discussion 175 08-16-2012 09:32 AM
The Ethanol Scam: Are ethanol advocates giving slanted mpg numbers? Ptero Fossil Fuel Free 15 04-22-2010 10:58 AM
The Ethanol Bubble Pops in Iowa hypermiler01 Fossil Fuel Free 13 04-18-2010 03:19 AM
Ethanol blends: 10% in "reg." gasoline, 5% in mid-grade, 0% in premium (in Ontario) MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 40 03-26-2010 10:27 AM
Ethanol in gasoline i_am_socket EcoModding Central 83 12-18-2008 10:01 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com