View Single Post
Old 11-22-2010, 09:09 PM   #30 (permalink)
t vago
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,766

The Karen-Mobile - '05 Dodge Magnum SXT
Team Dodge
90 day: 26.72 mpg (US)

Fiat Dakota - '00 Dodge Dakota SLT RWD Quad Cab
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)

The Red Sled - '01 Dodge Durango SLT 4WD
90 day: 16.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 799
Thanked 681 Times in 437 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
I am assuming it is some method of modification of the throttle body area of the induction system. If that assumption is correct then it should be reversible (swap throttle bodies) and therefore any benefit could be documented.


Apparently, the idea is to allow air to somehow travel around the throttle plate with reduced restriction, therefore reduced pumping loss past the plate. The idea itself sounds possible in theory, but I severely doubt that this modification results in a 20% or more fuel economy gain.

There's also the matter of the increased airflow around the throttle plate. How are you supposed to control engine output with this larger-than normal opening around the throttle plate?
__________________
The Fiat Dakota


The Karen-mobile


The Red Sled
  Reply With Quote