View Single Post
Old 12-31-2010, 01:51 AM   #13 (permalink)
tim3058
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tim3058's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147

Silver Bullet - '86 Chevy Camaro Z28
90 day: 19.74 mpg (US)

New Blue - '96 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 20.46 mpg (US)

Diesel - '96 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
Last 3: 13.56 mpg (US)

Tahoe #2 - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
90 day: 13.05 mpg (US)

SuperDuty - '08 Ford F-350 dually Lariat
90 day: 9.34 mpg (US)

Fundai - '09 Hyundai Elantra
90 day: 26.45 mpg (US)

HRV - '17 Honda HRV LX
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland View Post
What can a 5,000 pound pickup truck do that a 3,000 pound pickup truck not do?
Good point, unless you are towing a fully-loaded cargo trailer or car hauler, probably not much.
My Silverado 1500 regularly hauls my quad but rarely tows anything. An S10 or Colorado could have done the same thing - why not get the 3,000 lb mini-truck? Couple issues:
1) A new Colorado 4x4 (w/ext cab cause the reg cab is pretty small) was only a few thousand dollars less, for what seemed to be a lower quality vehicle, with notably less power, less cab room, and smaller box.
2) The Colorados only got about 2mpg better than the Silverados.
3) Resale on the small trucks is much less than the full-size versions.

For me buying brand new, the compacts just didn't compare. When considering total life-cycle cost though (purchase price, loan interest, fuel costs) - for 95% of the truck owners out there, a used S10 would suffice. Now if only we could convince people of that...
__________________


  Reply With Quote