View Single Post
Old 01-11-2011, 08:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
Jim-Bob
Junkyard Engineer
 
Jim-Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 167

Super-Metro! - '92 Geo Metro Base

$250 Pizza Delivery Car - '91 Geo Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 43.75 mpg (US)

Fronty the wonder truck - '98 Nissan Frontier XE
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
Too bad it wouldn't be closer to the 50mpg like the Metro, then it would definately be on the want list.

As to the cruze, i am hoping they make a Cruze with the voltlike drivetrain without the volt price, if the talk of that is true and the price is nice and low it would be a winner.
The Volt IS the electric Cruze. They share many of the same basic parts and the Volt is a derivative of the Cruze's architecture.

As for it's MPG, I too will not be holding my breath for a true Metro replacement. It seems that GM still doesn't get that there is a market for a real, back to basics economy car with little more than a small engine, a manual transmission, and a lightweight hatchback body. Either that or they are afraid that a $12k econobox will steal too much of the Volt's thunder if the fuel economy numbers are similar. It wouldn't be the first time that GM hobbled a low cost car to avoid hurting a halo car.
__________________
No green technology will ever make a substantive environmental impact until it is economically viable for most people to use it. This must be from a reduction in net cost of the new technology, not an increase in the cost of the old technology through taxation



(Note: the car sees 100% city driving and is EPA rated at 37 mpg city)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jim-Bob For This Useful Post:
Regenerit (05-04-2012)