Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
I'd say no on the grounds that science is not the field but the approach. If someone is into radioactive hoola-hoops or whatever, as long as they conduct actual testing, and do so in a transparent manner, including documenting possible sources of error in a sincere fashion, i'd say all power to them. (Assuming that their hypothesis of how their device works is subject to disproof to begin with)
|
I voted no because I don't want to miss any good ideas. However, I have noticed some of the sketchy things do not seem to have consistent testing to back them...