|
View Poll Results: Should EcoModder ban/discourage threads about certain mods? (e.g. magnets, HHO)
|
|
Yes - let's agree to talk about topics based on understood science/engineering principles.
|
   
|
27 |
32.14% |
|
No - we'll miss out on important new discoveries.
|
  
|
17 |
20.24% |
|
No - I am entertained by the musings of pseudo-scientists and conspiracy theorists.
|
  
|
39 |
46.43% |
|
AHA! You are obviously in the pocket of Big Oil FOR EVEN CONSIDERING THIS!!!!
|
  
|
14 |
16.67% |
02-01-2011, 11:22 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
halos.com
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
I'd say no on the grounds that science is not the field but the approach. If someone is into radioactive hoola-hoops or whatever, as long as they conduct actual testing, and do so in a transparent manner, including documenting possible sources of error in a sincere fashion, i'd say all power to them. (Assuming that their hypothesis of how their device works is subject to disproof to begin with)
|
I voted no because I don't want to miss any good ideas. However, I have noticed some of the sketchy things do not seem to have consistent testing to back them...
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 11:49 AM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Delayed response following the discussion in this thread...
New subforum created: " The Unicorn Corral"
Description:
Quote:
|
Is it a myth or is it real? Reader skepticism is advised in these discussions of questionable modifications that have yet to pass the Carl Sagan test: "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
|
The Unicorn Corral - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com |
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 12:58 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
|
So will moderators/admins move the "sketchy" topics to the new subforum.
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 01:08 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Feel free to post nominees in this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 05:58 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490
Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6 90 day: 31.12 mpg (US) Red - '00 Honda Insight Prius - '05 Toyota Prius 3 - '18 Tesla Model 3 90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
|
I think banning them is a bit too strong, but you could make a "Dustbin" category for claims that don't have any basis in sci/eng.
Edit- NVM, you did make a category...  |
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 09:00 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
|
A madman
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
|
So should threads like these:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ors-16406.html
Go as well? Since he is simply asking about them? And not making any claims? Plus he's new. Don't know why everyone is being harsh there.
But, I'd vote yes, it should still go. |
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 09:59 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Problem is some of the stupidest stuff draws the most commentary and clogs things up. I distinctly recall an HHO obsession virtually destroying what was once a decent site. Can't allow the B.S. to take over.
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 10:19 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hondo434
In Russia and China
|
The more you type, the more I am convinced you are a scammer. You do realize that the internet (on which this board is hosted) doesn't stop at the 'murrican border, and that it is read in russia and china?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hondo434
Posts with an opinion that have a face, two eyes and a nose and mouth and breathing deserve the same consideration as any other post.
|
NO, posts that are only opinion and have no data or repeatable results are not worth dog snot, they do not get or deserve any serious consideration (excepting for amusement as the poll indicates).
Quote:
Originally Posted by hondo434
We are talking about opinions here, everyone is entitled to their opinion.
|
No, the point is not to talk about "opinions", it is to figure out what works and what doesn't. Opinions are too much like politics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hondo434
If there needs to be a way for posters to show there allegiance then let there be a place next to the post with two places to check.
|
Again, NO, the owners of the board have expressly asked to refrain from using the "thanks" button as an applause meter when the discussion goes the way someone likes it. It is their board, you are a guest.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 11:42 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
|
As you can see from the poll results, banning speech and censorship of ideas (no matter how loony) are an expression and exercise of authoritarianism.
Creating a new sub-forum is a great idea. But labeling it as you suggested is inherently biased.
Why not give it a simply unbiased label such as calling it: radical ideas?
But don't be surprised if as a sub-forum, it becomes very popular...  |
|
|
|
|
03-13-2011, 11:48 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
Problem is some of the stupidest stuff draws the most commentary and clogs things up. I distinctly recall an HHO obsession virtually destroying what was once a decent site. Can't allow the B.S. to take over.
|
If it is limited (i.e. given it's own space or playground) it won't "clog anything up".
Instead of banning playfulness, we can recognize the usefulness and benefit of providing a playground, where "anything goes" - where playfulness and even total nonsense is OK. 
|
|
|
|
|
