View Single Post
Old 03-21-2011, 12:39 AM   #15 (permalink)
zonker
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
OPINION:

buying a new car instead of recycling the existing automotive fleet currently occupying our earth is counterproductive to reducing the carbon footprint, no matter what the fuel economy is.

in many cases, repairing an older car is a greener option than purchasing a new one.

so with that in mind, when i hear someone say they bought their brand new (enter your favorite car here) because they are trying to reduce their carbon footprint and be more responsible, i think they are only fooling themselves, because that not yet used up car sitting for sale in the classifieds will serve them much better.

and what happens if more people repair their old cars instead of buy new ones?
large multi-national companies (read major polluters) will shrink in size, and smaller cottage industries will thrive, bringing our hard earned dollars back out from wall street and into our local economy.
  Reply With Quote