View Single Post
Old 04-02-2011, 11:51 AM   #47 (permalink)
oldbeaver
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chile
Posts: 223

Mercedes 89 D - '89 Mercedes 300 E
90 day: 33.86 mpg (US)

Skodie - '09 Skoda Octavia TDI PD
90 day: 38.84 mpg (US)

1993 Mercedes 300D Turbo - '93 Mercedes Benz 300D Turbo W124
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Crossie - '16 Subaru XV Crosstreak
90 day: 9.61 mpg (US)

Crossie - '16 Subaru XV Crosstreak
90 day: 33.34 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Remapping for mpg gain in a Skoda 1.9 TDI ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
Nope, this engine (the one in the Autospeed article) has all the air it needs already. Improving the flow in this case made no difference at all. Adding fuel (via the remap) added the power.

I have seen loads of postings on Skoda forums where people with my car (PD130) have fitted the PD160 intake and say things like "wow". But no A-B-A testing and no before / after dyno to back it up. The PD160 replica intake made as part of this article made no difference, in fact it went worse.

There is no agreed international calibration for the butt-o-meter
I agree. I have a Skoda Octavia of 2009, with a 1.9 TDI engine and DSG transmission. Air intake that comes standard is bigger than the PD160 some are reccommending. So it has all the air intake it needs. This car is giving me over 48 mpg for a full tank.
Exhaust pipes as 2.5" factory standard.
Mileage is very difficult to improve with this beauty.

As it has a built in computer that gives real time consumption (marginal and mean), I am seeking a mean of remap "something" that can improve mileage, by means of software or such. I already bought a VAG cable, but need help to proceed.

Any suggestions?

Oldbeaver
__________________
Mercedes 300 D turbo 1993
  Reply With Quote