View Single Post
Old 05-08-2011, 10:50 PM   #308 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
It is desirable because it is how have got to where we are now and how we get to where we will be in the future.

Please explain to me how you think we should avoid it, and why ?
You are not done with your answer yet.

Where are we now? Overpopulated, with cluster****s and sprawl filling in between the clusters?

What does "growth" have to do with quality of life?

Would we not have technical advancements without growth? Why not?

Is there a positive direct connection between quality of life and growth? Why?

Look at a place like, say, California. Today, the nice temperate parts of it along the coast aren't much more than a support system for highways and streets. You can tell it was beautiful once upon a time. If you like cluster****s, it still is. I just think it would have been so much more awesome in that period before every square inch of it had human "development" on it- before my time, unfortunately.

I've got a "techie" brother-in-law that was so excited about an article he sent me about colonizing Mars. I was all, WTF? What is so great about the prospect of using the Earth up and then infesting another planet?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
jamesqf (05-09-2011), NeilBlanchard (05-08-2011)