Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-08-2011, 01:36 PM   #301 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
A growing economy is not possible in the long term. Sustainability is the only thing that will work in the long term.

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
cleanspeed1 (05-08-2011), Frank Lee (05-08-2011), Piwoslaw (05-08-2011), sid (05-08-2011)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-08-2011, 03:52 PM   #302 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
A growing economy is not possible in the long term. Sustainability is the only thing that will work in the long term.
Amen to that.
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 04:28 PM   #303 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
If where we are now is the ultimate limitation on what we can do then we have two choices - withdraw to circa 1700, or decide not to.

If you expect to grow an economy in the same way as before - with abundant cheap energy which can be wasted - then yes, there are limits.

However I think we have abundant skills and expertise on how to mitigate the limitations in place and continue to grow in the future. In short I choose the "decide not to" option.

After all we have adapted in the past and I see no reason why we can't continue to do so.

This does not mean "drill baby drill", it means lets use our brains more.

Same aim, maybe different paths.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 05:31 PM   #304 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
A growing economy is not possible in the long term. Sustainability is the only thing that will work in the long term.
Sadly there are NO politicians, govt leaders, or bidness leaders that are on board with that. It's all about growth growth growth with them. Someone needs to print up and distribute a politician/govt leader/ceo manual on SUSTAINABILITY and the reality of today and tomorrow.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
cleanspeed1 (05-08-2011)
Old 05-08-2011, 05:32 PM   #305 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
If where we are now is the ultimate limitation on what we can do then we have two choices - withdraw to circa 1700, or decide not to.

If you expect to grow an economy in the same way as before - with abundant cheap energy which can be wasted - then yes, there are limits.

However I think we have abundant skills and expertise on how to mitigate the limitations in place and continue to grow in the future. In short I choose the "decide not to" option.

After all we have adapted in the past and I see no reason why we can't continue to do so.

This does not mean "drill baby drill", it means lets use our brains more.

Same aim, maybe different paths.
Explain to me why growth is so important and desireable to you.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 06:03 PM   #306 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Explain to me why growth is so important and desireable to you.
It is desirable because it is how have got to where we are now and how we get to where we will be in the future.

Please explain to me how you think we should avoid it, and why ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 07:27 PM   #307 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
If where we are now is the ultimate limitation on what we can do then we have two choices - withdraw to circa 1700, or decide not to.
No, because life isn't one-dimensional: we have a choice of many (probably an infinite number) of directions.

The important thing to realize is that on our current path... well, if you plotted each of the multitude of factors that go into making up "quality of life" (and accepting that most of them are in some degree subjective), you'd see that many if not most of them have peaked, and are heading downwards.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 09:50 PM   #308 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
It is desirable because it is how have got to where we are now and how we get to where we will be in the future.

Please explain to me how you think we should avoid it, and why ?
You are not done with your answer yet.

Where are we now? Overpopulated, with cluster****s and sprawl filling in between the clusters?

What does "growth" have to do with quality of life?

Would we not have technical advancements without growth? Why not?

Is there a positive direct connection between quality of life and growth? Why?

Look at a place like, say, California. Today, the nice temperate parts of it along the coast aren't much more than a support system for highways and streets. You can tell it was beautiful once upon a time. If you like cluster****s, it still is. I just think it would have been so much more awesome in that period before every square inch of it had human "development" on it- before my time, unfortunately.

I've got a "techie" brother-in-law that was so excited about an article he sent me about colonizing Mars. I was all, WTF? What is so great about the prospect of using the Earth up and then infesting another planet?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
jamesqf (05-09-2011), NeilBlanchard (05-08-2011)
Old 05-08-2011, 10:04 PM   #309 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
We need to go back to sustainable i.e organic agriculture -- it works with the cycle of life, and improves the soil over time, and help the soil hold water and build it up rather than erode. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides and mono cultures and factory farming are depleting the soil and the aquifers quickly, and erosion and runoff is causing dead zones, and adds about 25% of the greenhouse gases in the form of nitrous oxide. Water soluble nitrogen runs off -- about 80% of it; and combines with oxygen. The natural organic process forms fixed nitrogen, which does not run off in the first place.

But, I think we will need to keep things like the Internet, and modern medicine, etc. So, we need to stop doing the unsustainable things, but keep the stuff that is truly valuable.

Dirt! The Movie
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 10:23 PM   #310 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I've got a "techie" brother-in-law that was so excited about an article he sent me about colonizing Mars. I was all, WTF? What is so great about the prospect of using the Earth up and then infesting another planet?
Since you haven't given up your corral of fuel consuming pollution emitters, and you are still alive and complaining of overpopulation, I can conclude that you are a hypocrite.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-20-2012 11:34 PM
Trouble-shooter's top question in '07? How to handle high fuel prices. MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 7 03-14-2011 01:37 PM
Gas prices in Hawaii are iNsAnE!! no_roads Introductions 13 03-04-2008 05:37 PM
News: Canadian gas prices may pass $1.30/L ($4.93/US gal) in months with $100 oil MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 5 01-04-2008 02:08 PM
As Vancouver gas prices soar, so does transit use MetroMPG Alternative Transportation 0 12-01-2007 11:26 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com