I apologize if that seemed too harsh, but come on. I'm insulting blind faith in nonsense.
In how many decades? of screwing around with it, NOBODY has made a successful HHO system, success being defined as an actual fuel efficiency increase. Nobody.
It's like throwing a cup of red dye in the ocean and expecting it all to turn red... it's like shovelling your driveway with a teaspoon; you'll see some result, but not one that's any good or can be called a success.
There is a reason why GM, Ford, MIT, Argonne Natl Labs, GE, U of Washington, the U.S. military, EPA, and whoever else has not developed and claimed success with HHO. I'll give you a hint and say it isn't because they never heard of it.
I challenge you or anyone to provide evidence of a successful HHO system. Testimonials and anecdotes and prayers and wishful thinking are not admissable. Beyond that I'm not wasting any more time on it; search HHO here, or find out what the U.S. Govt. has to say about it (it is online), or find the Popular Mechanics tests of economy devices (online as well).
|