|
Awsome design.. and photoshop, my question is this, aerodynamically is the up turn on the nose best.. Ideally the logical side is a very low pointed angle, like a F1 car is pushing more air over the car and less under body where it has stuff to get hunk up on.
However one though was that to much air rammed under the car is going to rais ride hight to some extent.. and ideally the car lowering at high speed would be ideal but not to much you need a balance of force to drive through the air and not up lift or to much down force other wise that just more drag... around and over seem the logical best practice.
However a low long nose makes speed bumps and drive ways very treacherous... I gave thoughts to a motorized adjustable nose that would angle up for low speed driving, such as a concord jet had.. when driving slow its in a angled up position to clear speed bumps etc. and when at high speed it lowers the angle to flat and allows maximum over body and less under body air., However I have been looking at noses on recent sports cars and even the ev1 ect, and the logical idea is as much of a bow or point you can bring out in front of the car.. to cut through the air and direct it around the car. Lokk at photos of the the latest 1996 fire birds, very pointed rounded low nose angles pushing air over and around the car.. The ev1 was very rounded front end.. yeas a water drop is very very rounded, however its not a car.. seems a point in front like the fire birds would be the ideal wind cutting shape.. considering were pushing a basically square shape through the air.. Your design looks pointed more so than rounded.. Is this the idea?
__________________
|