View Single Post
Old 06-22-2011, 09:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Well it is dangerous to venture into armchair aerodynamics but I'm gonna give it a shot anyway: I think when we "break" a rear slope then re-attach thus trapping a vortice, the vortice really needs to be trapped so it sits there "rolling". If there is flow through that region I'm guessing it won't allow a trapped vortice to form. I think if flow comes in through the sides and goes out the back that yes, the flow down the back could be nice. The "but" is the same thing I've said about ducts: now you have internal and external flow drag.

And then there is the ever-present cross-wind flow...

If I EVER get around to finishing my aerolid I am going to incorporate a rear window treatment as the Chrysler PNGV car has.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-22-2011 at 09:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote