Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-22-2011, 10:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Another Pickup Aerolid

Many guys have proposed some variant of the "fastback" sloping down at various angles. Some seem to work better (in reducing drag) than others but all have the same problem: They restrict vision out the rear window.

Here's another idea.

Currently my truck is running around with a A.R.E. hard tonneau. Big-timeflow separtion but I see out of it nicely.

What I am thinking about is a series of flat plates, stepping down trying to keep the flow attached at a ten degree angle. I should be able to see out OK.

What do you think?

The tonneau


Two plates with no duckbill


Two plates with duckbill


Three plates with duckbill


I'm not too sure my duckbill is doing much for me. It is 18 inches long and drops 3 inches.

Big-time thanks to Carlos for his help with this.

__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-22-2011, 10:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Well it is dangerous to venture into armchair aerodynamics but I'm gonna give it a shot anyway: I think when we "break" a rear slope then re-attach thus trapping a vortice, the vortice really needs to be trapped so it sits there "rolling". If there is flow through that region I'm guessing it won't allow a trapped vortice to form. I think if flow comes in through the sides and goes out the back that yes, the flow down the back could be nice. The "but" is the same thing I've said about ducts: now you have internal and external flow drag.

And then there is the ever-present cross-wind flow...

If I EVER get around to finishing my aerolid I am going to incorporate a rear window treatment as the Chrysler PNGV car has.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-22-2011 at 10:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 02:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
Frank makes a good point. Flow Illustrator is only in 2-D cross-section. A vehicle moves through the air in 3-D. Do we assume that the sides of this cap are solid like Bondo's hinged aerocap, with flat plates instead of a hatch? I sure would like to see someone build and test a version of this idea.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 07:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
I rather liked the earlier idea of yours of a rear cover similar to the Camaro/Firebird rear window "slats" as a visibility "solution".
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 08:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Talking about end conditions is little premature until I get a section I like. It looks like the duckbill+3 plates keeps the flow attached the best.

Probably the aftmost plate will have solid sheet metal supports on the ends (sides?) You can’t see under that plate anyway.

The intermediate plate (or plates) will probably be supported by struts. At first just threaded rod til I can work out angles and heights. The whole point is to have some visibility to the rear and to the quarters.

The duckbill will get a tapered side support.

The duckbill worries me. In the sims the duckbill does not even begin to turn the flow and we get separation.

__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com