View Single Post
Old 07-27-2011, 03:55 PM   #98 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
You also can't answer others' questions about your supposedly working system. You cannot provide a working video, instead referring us to some ad copy on your website. You cannot answer questions about actual thermodynamic pumping losses in an internal combustion engine, preferring instead to claim that your "DCD" can't work with real variable displacement engines. The things that you claim of your DCD would throw a late-model car with OBDII into limp-in mode.

I've noticed that you did not offer to warrant Dunkler's engine as he had requested as part being a volunteer to test your device. False reassurances do not a warranty make. An unspecified "many" vehicles for 10 vehicle-years? Really? It's not Dunkler's responsibility to fix his engine if your device should break it - it's yours.

Show us something that's actually working, HeiHetech. You've been promising something for 3 years running, with no actual device.
I wouldn't expect this thing to work with an engine that already has DOD- two competing systems = trouble... unless the factory DOD was deactivated for tests.

I wouldn't warranty someone else's engine either. Whoever wants to play this game assumes the risk. That said, I don't see how it would hurt anything therefore I think the risk for damage is low. But I do think the risk for wasted time and energy is high as I believe the entire premise is faulty.
__________________


  Reply With Quote