Thread: F150 Ecomods(?)
View Single Post
Old 08-04-2011, 10:55 PM   #64 (permalink)
Fat Charlie
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
The 94 is a tank compared to that later model. It may actually be too tough and not collapse and absorb as much energy.
As they say in the field, armor makes you stupid. The tank, once the hole is patched, can be fielded again with another crew. The soup sandwich of its previous crew needs to be pressure washed out of the hull before the new crew sallies forth, but the tank's own robustness is not to be questioned. Ever! That would undermine the confidence of its next crew. Just like y'all's F-150.

Back in 04 I was down in Kuwait one day and saw an Abrams on two flatbeds. In descending order, count! Two flatbeds! One tank! Zero crewmen! There's your mom's pickup, Steven Wrigley. Stop listening to your mother and buy yourself a car. Her ignorance is dangerous.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote