Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-04-2011, 08:18 PM   #61 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
As Jon Stewart once said, "Hey! That can tow the boat I don't own up the mountain I don't live near!"
LOL! Ed Zachary!!! I was going to say something about the American penchant for bringing a bazooka to a knife fight, but Jon said it better!

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-04-2011, 08:19 PM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Wrigley View Post
Hahahahaha! A Ranger drive train in a fullsize That would be uh... interesting for sure! lol I do have a old Massey ferguson from the 50s but its gas. That wouldnt have been the weirdest thing Ive seen done! On a side note I found crash test footage of a much newer f150 than mine and its just scary. Mom wasnt to happy about that. Then I showed her a Civic crash test and it was like night and day. If I wasnt concerned with gas mileage Id get a Civic because theyre safer! I couldnt find a crash rating of a 94 f150 though.
Steven, the crash test data was for the first model after yours that did not have the twin I beam front suspension and straight frame rails like your 94.

The 94 is a tank compared to that later model. It may actually be too tough and not collapse and absorb as much energy.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 08:25 PM   #63 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
Now that was a good line, Fat Charlie!
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 10:55 PM   #64 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
The 94 is a tank compared to that later model. It may actually be too tough and not collapse and absorb as much energy.
As they say in the field, armor makes you stupid. The tank, once the hole is patched, can be fielded again with another crew. The soup sandwich of its previous crew needs to be pressure washed out of the hull before the new crew sallies forth, but the tank's own robustness is not to be questioned. Ever! That would undermine the confidence of its next crew. Just like y'all's F-150.

Back in 04 I was down in Kuwait one day and saw an Abrams on two flatbeds. In descending order, count! Two flatbeds! One tank! Zero crewmen! There's your mom's pickup, Steven Wrigley. Stop listening to your mother and buy yourself a car. Her ignorance is dangerous.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 12:42 AM   #65 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Steven Wrigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 38

Greenguzzler - '94 Ford F150
Last 3: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cleanspeed1 View Post
I'm tellin' ya dude, just give momma the facts and get Dad to work his angle. You'll be outta that bigg'n in two shakes.

Now, what I had in mind is a T-Bird Turbo 4 cylinder, high torque cam, and then run that heifer on E85. 30 psi boost for those Superman moments, Pinto economy when you don't.

What?! Stop laughing!
I dont think Ford new what crumple zones were when they designed the F150. Atleast it has one airbag. My defense to the car is safer argument is theres a ton of weight in the bed and drive train behind the cab. Thats gotta go some where during a crash! What only 30 psi boost?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 12:44 AM   #66 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Steven Wrigley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 38

Greenguzzler - '94 Ford F150
Last 3: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
As they say in the field, armor makes you stupid. The tank, once the hole is patched, can be fielded again with another crew. The soup sandwich of its previous crew needs to be pressure washed out of the hull before the new crew sallies forth, but the tank's own robustness is not to be questioned. Ever! That would undermine the confidence of its next crew. Just like y'all's F-150.

Back in 04 I was down in Kuwait one day and saw an Abrams on two flatbeds. In descending order, count! Two flatbeds! One tank! Zero crewmen! There's your mom's pickup, Steven Wrigley. Stop listening to your mother and buy yourself a car. Her ignorance is dangerous.
Oh believe me if I had money Id have a civic right now! Aeromodded ofcourse! I wonder how much I can get if If I get a job before school starts....
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 01:53 PM   #67 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucey View Post
Hey there is an idea! Throw an old diesel tractor motor in it. Glub glub glub.
I met a guy a year or so ago driving an old 80-something 1/2-ton pickup with a Chevy Bowtie on the front, a GMC stamped in the tailgate and a Cummins placard on the side. Turns out, he blew the original engine and had an old 4-cylinder Cummins diesel out of an old tractor he's put in there. I think he said he had over 100k miles on the diesel engine. The tailgate was just a replacement from a junkyard. Gotta love it.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 02:07 PM   #68 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
That Cummins B3.9 swap into a Ford or Chevy pickup is as easy as getting the mounts and brackets from Mill Supply. This was standard fare in the breadvans. Either had a C6, Turbo 400 or Clark trans behind it.

Too bad they're kinda spendy right now. You could actually get a 5.9 Cummins cheaper on the open market. But if you find an old Frito Lay truck or similiar for 1500.00 to 3000.00, just get the motor, trans and mounts out ( if it's a Ford chassis ), switch it over and turn the pump up a little ( they're usually set at 80 - 120 hp ). You'll have a truck that'll get in the 30-40 mpg range or so.
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 02:13 PM   #69 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave View Post
I met a guy a year or so ago driving an old 80-something 1/2-ton pickup with a Chevy Bowtie on the front, a GMC stamped in the tailgate and a Cummins placard on the side. Turns out, he blew the original engine and had an old 4-cylinder Cummins diesel out of an old tractor he's put in there. I think he said he had over 100k miles on the diesel engine. The tailgate was just a replacement from a junkyard. Gotta love it.
Yup! There was a local guy that had a Jeep Wrangler with a 5 cylinder Mercedes Diesel in it, even though it was set up for heavy offroading (giant lift, 35" tires, etc) he got high 20's with it. Drove it to work everyday. When I get out of the city finally, I was thinking an old F150 with a 4BT in it would be perfect. The people who do that swap are reporting 30 mpg with 4WD and mean tires. My little wagon can only hold so much, and that's with 4x8 trailer I got going with it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 02:25 PM   #70 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
And a 100k is just a good break in mileage. Those bad boys will literally go forever if you don't go stupid with the modifications, and replace the harmonic balancer when you're supposed to. They are very vibey ( no balance shafts ).

The Perkins 4-236 is another one. Just an English B3.9. Good engines, came in the Ford and GM commercial chassis too.

__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com