View Single Post
Old 08-06-2011, 04:22 AM   #2 (permalink)
California98Civic
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by actwithclarity View Post
Had to drive 200 kms, lots of highway and some city. That's almost half my tank so I decided to P&G, filled up at the end, and got 54 MPG which is pretty much normal for me (drafting or driving slow).

On the highways I was running late, so I was pulsing to 70mph and gliding to around 55mph. It wasn't going well. My pulses were almost longer than my glides. I decelerated pretty fast as soon as I clutched in. I think there is too much air resistance at that speed, and my tires probably ought to be overinflated.

Later on I was pulsing to around 35-50 mph and gliding down depending on the speed of traffic and limits, and it was much much smoother. I could easily glide twice as long as my pulses. I suspect I made up for a lot of the MPG at this stage, since my gauge was going down faster than normal to begin with.

Advice?

Also, today on the highway I pissed off an ambulance who was driving behind me (only 1 lane). I would speed up to 110, and he speeds up to the same, then I glide down and he's right on my tail, then suddenly I would pull ahead and repeat. Then I saw him flashing his brights in my mirror. Finally he got an opportunity to pass me, so he went ahead and started driving 50mph in front of me, glaring at me from the side mirror. So I just P&G at a lower speed until he lost interest and drove away.
Sweet little car. I see them in a whole new light since joining this forum. I'll bet you'll get more out of it if you invest in a gauge. Can the 1991 Metro use an UltraGauge or Scangauge? The precision of your pulses would improve, probably yielding more efficiency.

Definitely consider the fact that resistance and drag factors become more of a factor at faster speeds. Personally I try not to drive faster than 65 at the top of a pulse. Wind resistance on the car is just greater. I also would consider only 10mph arcs at highway speeds. I only say it because that is what I am doing and getting lovely results (68.4 on my 22 mile freeway leg today without slip-streaming or anything besides 55-65 mph P&G, engine on).

On the annoyed ambulance driver (pretty funny it's an ambulance!)... Why not just encourage a pass? Glide down to a much slower pace, hew close to the shoulder side of the lane, and flag the driver by... saves you headaches. There are lots of ways to do it. We get really focused on our performance driving, so if we're not careful we're kinda like street drag-racers: the drag is different but the lack of consideration for others is the same. I have pissed-off some folks behind me without even trying, and later had to realize I could have just let 'em by. so... simple...
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote