Re my comment:
Quote:
|
Oh, pardonnez-moi! "Contempt" is so much more enlightened and sophisticated than ordinary "hatred"!
|
You replied: "I wouldn't know about that, but it IS different. In addition to reading comprehension, I'd suggest some work on vocabulary :-)"
Again, your tactic is to always try to put your opponent on the defensive in providing proof. Here it is (and you can go argue with dictionaries instead of me):
From Webster's College Dictionary, 2001, Random House (chosen at random):
Contempt: 1. A feeling of disdain for anything considered mean, vile or worthless; scorn. 2. The state of being despised; disgrace.
Hate: 1. To dislike intensely or passionately; feel extreme aversion or hostility toward; detest.
Disdain:
Synonyms for disdain | Synonym.com
Oh sure - your latest rationalization is that despising something or expressing scorn for it (contempt) has no relation to having an intense dislike of it (hatred). More deep denial and rationalization from you, as usual. I don't think you are unable to recognize synonyms or the overall meaning of your words in totality.
Your defensiveness and denial are an attempt to hide your true feelings and exculpate yourself.
Quote:
|
...your pronounced "contempt" is also in step with that same sentiment shared by the Left...
|
Your reply: "Add political science to the list of things you need to work on."
Again, you refuse to acknowledge my observation that all your comments are in lock step with a Leftist agenda. Your rationalization is that it is all a mere coincidence. More
denial - big time.
Res ipsa loquitur.
And if you don't understand that phrase, add Latin "to the list of things you need to work on".