View Single Post
Old 09-29-2011, 08:55 PM   #13 (permalink)
darcane
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
It was a new episode last night, so likely not available elsewhere, yet.

The bikes were progressively cleaner by date - the 80's bike was the worst. The new 2010 Yamaha 250 was the cleanest bike, and proportionally cleaner with the aero fairing. That's good news. I believe it is fuel injected. Still no catalytic converter I believe, so that's where the emissions came from.

Not sure if it was by total emissions or by percent. Still, even if it was by percent it comes out as worse. At maybe 1/2 the car's fuel consumption but 5x (by percent) the emissions, that's still 2.5x total output. If it was total, that's WAY worse.
They specifically mentioned that they chose the bike because it was small displacement, fuel injected, and had a catalytic converter.

Cats started showing up on bikes shortly after EFI. My '06 Ninja 650R has EFI and a cat. Although, I don't think the regulations are as strict for bikes and cats though. There is no testing that I am aware of and all the exhaust systems I've seen don't have cats, so I have to assume that it's not illegal to remove them like it is with a car.

Their measurements were in absolute numbers, not percentages. They did compare these numbers later as a percentage of the cars emissions though. The '00s bike's CO and NOx emissions were like 3000% and 8000% of the '00s car's but not because the bike was high, only because the car was essentially 0.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to darcane For This Useful Post:
PaleMelanesian (09-30-2011)