|
your reply reflects just about everything I said.
Instead of acknowledging THE FACT that you admitted to, you want to throw up defections.straw man arguements.
"if only you knew me" wow....get a grip. We do know you, read your first post.
listen to yourself " I have posted nothing that would support this claim." You posted your comments!!!
Light coming uot of an iccorrect housing is NOT improved light. And like most ricers, you are COMPLETELY unaware of the impact of improper nighttime lighting on the eye.
9 yrs. YOu have been doing this 9 years. Do you realize how really stupid and "i have my head in the sand' you sound?
Maybe, I would forgive you if this was 3-4 yrs ago.
But the amount of FACTUAL information available that proves you are uniformed is staggering.
"I aim it low" So you admit that it causes others problems and you admit that you 'sacrifice' because of it.
********************************************
My questions for you:
1. Assuming there are legal and "optimized" retrofit kits available for my application, what is the maximum amount I should be expected to pay for the sake of compliance of law and other driver comfort?
**********again, self-centered punk*********
Driving is a priviledge.
*****************************************
2. Should all things that could negatively impact others environment always be avoided?
**********again, self-centered punk*********
Driving is a priviledge.
*****************************************
3. Is it ever appropriate to break the law? Are there some laws that are acceptable to break under certain circumstances?
**********again, self-centered punk*********
Driving is a priviledge.
*****************************************
amazing, really.
you are an admitted liar. To law enforcement no less.
|